|
|
About the Corridor: Corridor Studies
Gap Analysis ||| Mapping ||| CEQA
Gap Analysis
Spencer, Wayne (Conservation Biology Institute). 2005.
Maintaining Ecological Connectivity Across the
Missing Middle of the Puente-Chino Hills Wildlife Corridor. (2.71 MB)
The Puente-Chino Hills Wildlife Corridor is a peninsula of mostly undeveloped
hills jutting about 42 km (26 miles) from the Santa Ana Mountains into the heart
of the densely urbanized Los Angeles Basin. Intense public interest in
conserving open space here has created a series of reserves and parks along most
of the corridor’s length, but significant gaps in protection remain.
These natural habitat areas support a surprising diversity of native wildlife,
from mountain lions and mule deer to walnut groves, roadrunners, and horned
lizards. But maintaining this diversity
of life requires maintaining functional connections along the entire length of
the corridor, so that wildlife can move between reserves—from one end of the
hills to the other.
Already the corridor is fragmented by development and crossed by numerous busy
roads, which create hazards and in some cases barriers to wildlife movement.
Proposed developments threaten to further degrade or even sever the movement
corridor, especially within its so-called
“Missing Middle.” This mid-section of the corridor system, stretching from
Tonner Canyon on the east to Harbor Boulevard on the west, includes several
large properties proposed for newhousing, roads, golf courses, and reservoirs.
Such developments would reduce habitat area and the capacity to support
area-dependent species and, if poorly designed, could block wildlife movement
through the corridor.
This report builds on an impressive array of previous ecological and wildlife
movement studies in the Puente-Chino Hills, as well as the general literature on
wildlife movement corridors as it applies to this unique peninsula of wildness.
It supplements the existing information with an analysis of gaps in
protection—with special focus on the vulnerale Missing Middle—and recommends
conservation and management actions to prevent further loss of ecological
connectivity and retain native species.
GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM MAPPING
Schlotterbeck, Melanie. 2001.
GIS Mapping of Biological
Studies in the Puente-Chino Hills Wildlife Corridor Including Species Diversity
and Relative Abundance.
(7.9 MB)
Known as a global “hotspot” of biodiversity because of its unique and threatened
flora and fauna, some areas of southern California are becoming islands of
habitat. The Puente-Chino Hills, on the eastern side of the Los Angeles Basin,
provide an excellent example of an ecosystem at risk. Government agencies,
concerned citizens, and researchers are drawn to the region for several reasons:
its biodiversity, its beauty, and to understand what is at risk of extinction.
Four important biological studies have been conducted in the hills in the past
few years. These include vegetation, carnivore, herpetofauna, and avian studies.
Only the vegetation and avian projects included digital maps.
This project has put into digital form both the carnivore and herpetofauna
studies through the use of geographic information systems (GIS). For both
studies, themes were created for each scat transect and track station (used in
the mammal study) and each pit-fall trap array (used in the reptile study).
Themes included both a presence/absence layer as well as a detailed relative
abundance layer. To determine the species diversity of the Corridor, the
Shannon-Weiner diversity index was utilized, as it is commonly used as a
measurement for diversity among ecological communities and to assess impacts of
disturbances. During this mapping project, various corridor types (box and arch
culverts, underpasses, equestrian, and service tunnels) were identified and
individually mapped along all roadways bisecting the Corridor.
The importance of this mapping project is three fold. First, it added two
significant layers of detailed information to an existing GIS mapping project
currently underway at Whittier College. Second, it helped two completed studies
(by Crooks and Haas, Case and Fisher) become compatible with other projects
layers. Finally, it will become a historical documentation of species once found
in the Puente-Chino Hills. These themes have been integrated into the mapping
project at Whittier College, under the guidance of Dr. Cheryl Swift, and have
been made available to various agencies such as the Wildlife Corridor
Conservation Authority and California State Parks.
Biological corridors connecting the fragmented habitats are one important remedy
in the management of these hills and preservation of its natural processes.
Without connections to viable habitats the wildlife in the Puente-Chino Hills
will become island populations. The habitat will lose its diversity of species
and eventually become a landscape devoid of many endemic inhabitants. If that is
the case, this mapping project will have documented what was once here, or be
used in finding solutions to the situation.
WILDLIFE CORRIDORS AND C.E.Q.A.
Schlotterbeck, Jennifer. 2003. Considering Impacts to
Wildlife Corridors Under the California Environmental Quality Act: Effects in
the Whittier-Puente-Chino Hills.
This article explores the concept of the "wildlife corridor" as a means of
protecting biological diversity in California. The works of prominent
conservation biologists are described, along with the efforts of Southern
California conservationists to preserve biodiversity in the
Whittier-Puente-Chino Hills by connecting large swaths of open space with
corridors through which various species can migrate. The article posits that the
veracity of wildlife corridors is well accepted in the scientific community, but
that conservationists, despite having various legal means at their disposal to
protect open space, are still at a disadvantage when it comes to protecting
wildlife species. The article further suggests that the conservation of
biological diversity is a policy goal under the California Environmental Quality
Act. It then proposes that an amendment to the CEQA Guidelines mandating
consideration of impacts to wildlife corridors, defining those impacts, and
suggesting mitigation measures is legally justified. Finally, the article
proposes exact language for the amendment, as reviewed by leading biologists in
the field, and demonstrates how such an amendment would benefit the
Whittier-Puente-Chino Hills.
Editor's Note: This article was published Ecology Law Quarterly in the February
2004.
|